| |
|
Mennonite Brethren Herald • Volume 44, No. 04 • March 18, 2005 |
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Mennonite Brethren are keenly interested in their denomination and want to be involved in planning its future. This was the finding of a survey conducted at the end of 2004 by the new executive board of the Canadian MB Conference. 77% of survey respondents said they were “enthusiastic about our denomination,” 82% said it is important for their church to be “part of the MB Conference,” and 72% said their church should support the Conference financially. 1015 people responded to the survey, which was open to all members and adherents of MB churches. It was available through churches and on the conference website, and was also mailed to a random sampling of 325 members from the MB Herald mailing list. Some 80 of this latter group replied. Participation was fairly representative of MB population geographically. More males than females responded. Response was strong in all ages from 26 up, with the largest numbers in the 40 to 55 age range, and from those who have attended an MB church more than 20 years.
The survey consisted of 31 questions, most of them statements to which respondents could choose one of five responses: strongly agree, agree, neither agree or disagree, disagree, strongly disagree. The questions ranged over the areas of ministry currently provided in the conference structure. The board wanted to hear the thoughts and feelings of Mennonite Brethren about these ministries, as well as other concerns, in order to better plan for the future. AnalysisLes Stahlke of GovernanceMatters Inc. compiled and analyzed the results, and presented them to the final Council of Boards meetings, and to the Executive Board and Board of Faith and Life meetings, held in Abbotsford Jan. 28–29. The large number of responses and relatively even distribution of data over the demographic variables suggests the survey “reliably reflects the thoughts and feelings of the individuals of the MB Conference” regarding its content, he said. Furthermore, the “number, length and intensity” of the comments made in addition to marking a response suggests that people “embraced the survey and want to be involved in planning the future ministry at the Conference level.” The comments add “rich colour and meaning to the assessment of the respondents to each statement,” said Stahlke. They were distilled and collated – about a quarter of them yielded more than 40 pages of tiny-print material that board members were urged to read and consider carefully. Although there was diversity of opinion on some subjects, the survey also indicated a sense of unity within the Conference, said Stahlke. “The willingness to dialogue and share differences openly is a sign of a healthy church.” In generalSeveral questions related to the Canadian Conference in general. As already stated, high commitment levels were expressed through the results. Survey respondents also strongly agreed that they are committed to “our Evangelical/Anabaptist distinctives.” In ranking the four “foci” under which the Conference has organized its ministries, respondents chose “healthy churches” as their highest priority in terms of allocation of resources. Leadership development ranked second, reaching out third, and financial ministries last. Enthusiasm for the Conference did not necessarily represent knowledge of denominational services, however. Only half of respondents agreed that they have “an adequate understanding of the programs and benefits of the Canadian Conference.”
Confessional integrityThe service of “confessional integrity” offered by the Board of Faith and Life (BFL) was highly valued, expressed uniformly across all demographic variables. Close to 90% of respondents said they were “committed to our Evangelical/Anabaptist distinctives.” In three questions about resources BFL provides (study conferences, pamphlet series, the Confession of Faith), close to 30% had no opinion on the value of study conferences, some 50% said the pamphlet series on doctrinal issues helped them “develop direction in theology and life practice” and more than 60% said the Confession of Faith helped them develop such direction. Stahlke suggested that the low assessment of the value of study conferences may reflect the low number of respondents able to attend such conferences.
Women in leadershipThe statement “Qualified women should be permitted to fill any ministry role, including that of senior pastor” was the one on which respondents were most divided and on which their opinions were held most strongly. Only 10% were ambivalent (neither agree nor disagree); 49% strongly agreed or agreed with the statement; 36% strongly disagreed or disagreed. This question also indicated divergence by gender and age. Slightly more women than men agreed and more of them were ambivalent. Those ages 18–55 agreed at 58%, compared to 42% in the 56 and older group. In his analysis, Stahlke noted the 16% spread in these age groups and commented that in 40 years the youngest people in the 18–55 age group will be the youngest in the 56 and over group. If the same spread of opinion continues, he said, the percentage favouring qualified women as senior pastors will rise to 74% in one generation.
Our nameThe statement that Mennonite Brethren should change their name so it “does not reflect ethnicity or gender” also revealed diversity in the demographic variables. Among respondents as a whole, 52% disagreed with the statement, with 23% agreeing and 18% ambivalent. Those respondents who are pastors (compared to members, attendees and elders/council leaders), however, agreed with the statement at 47% and disagreed with it at 23%.
Ministry resources and historical workGenerally, respondents affirmed the value of resources and training provided by the Conference in ministry areas relating to adults, children and youth. More than 70% agreed that it is beneficial to their leaders to have access to these services. Even more (81%) said that the Conference should continue to produce Anabaptist/MB resource materials for the churches. Similar affirmation was given the work of maintaining historical information and understanding the past.
Leadership developmentFour survey statements dealt with leadership development. All of them related to programs of Mennonite Brethren Biblical Seminary
Reaching outFor reasons of timing and other circumstances in preparing the survey, Mennonite Brethren Mission and Service International There was solid recognition (68%) of the benefits of promoting evangelism in the cities of Calgary, Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver through the Key Cities Initiative. When it came to whether the Canadian Conference is helping the respondent’s own church “make a significant impact in our community,” only 20% agreed or strongly agreed, compared to 36% who were ambivalent on the statement and 31% who disagreed or strongly disagreed.
FinancesAwareness of the financial services the Conference provides to constituents in addition to its role within the infrastructure of conference work – services such as savings accounts, RRSP, student saving accounts, and loans for churches – came in at medium levels (54%). There was higher awareness of will preparation services offered (69%). In his analysis, Les Stahlke suggested this level of understanding may suggest “there are not enough resources allocated to this service to make the members and churches aware of the potential benefits.” This service was only recently identified as a 4th “focus” of the Conference, he said.
Building communitySix questions addressed areas of communication or “community building” such as the Conference periodicals, website and biennial conventions. 74% said they read one of the four Conference publications (MB Herald, MB Chinese Herald, Mennonitische Rundschau About half of respondents (52%) felt the biennial conventions are an effective method of “communicating with the churches about shared ministry,” 64% agreed they are “an effective method of celebrating together and building community,” and 55% agreed they are “an effective method of conducting the business of the Conference.” Less than half (41%) agreed that “Acting on behalf of our churches, the Canadian Conference is relating to the wider Christian community appropriately.”
ConclusionsThe Executive Board elected at Gathering 2004 met for the first time in October to review and discuss a first draft of the strategic planning survey. It was hoped that the survey could be completed and analyzed in time for the transition from the Council of Boards model to the new governance model in January. This meant the survey was prepared fairly quickly and that people were asked to respond to it during the busy Christmas season. Similarly, production schedules meant that plans to carry the survey in the periodicals, including translating it for the French, German and Chinese papers, were not realized. In spite of these limitations in the survey, the Executive Board has been encouraged by the responses and grateful for the keen response and the many helpful comments and critiques. The Board did some initial evaluation of the results at their January meeting and meets again in April. After more opportunity to consider the results and digest the comments, it intends to develop a strategic plan for Conference ministry. Executive director David Wiebe says the Board will continue to use surveys and other ways of listening in the future, both to hone in on feedback on specific areas of service, or to track results where changes have been made. —Dora Dueck, from reports
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| |
| © 2008 Mennonite Brethren Herald Masthead and usage information |
| |
| | ||